Legal Opinion

Woicik v. Woicik

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1971PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMax Bloom, J.

Plaintiff sues, alternatively, for divorce or separation, predicated upon the charge of cruel and inhuman treatment (Domestic Eelations Law, § 170, subd. [1]). At the close of the entire case he moved to withdraw so much of his prayer for relief as sought a separation. Decision thereon was reserved. The application is now granted.

Defendant has counterclaimed for a separation, charging cruel and inhuman treatment (Domestic Eelations Law, § 200, subd. 1) and abandonment (Domestic Delations Law, § 200, subd. 2).

The proof submitted amply demonstrates the .substance of the charge of cruel' and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. See v. SeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Burch v. BurchCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  4. Mueller v. MuellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Gilmore v. GilmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dodd v. DoddNew York Supreme Court · 1978
  2. John W. S. v. Jeanne F. S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. Biamonte v. BiamonteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  4. Perotti v. PerottiNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Odette R. v. Douglas R.New York Family Court · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API