Fry v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BOEHM, Justice.
DeQuan Fry was convicted of murder, conspiracy to commit robbery, robbery, and assisting a criminal. He was sentenced to sixty-eight years imprisonment. In this direct appeal, he contends that: (1) the trial court abused its discretion in admitting evidence of a scheme to steal a big-sereen television; (2) the trial court abused its discretion in refusing a jury instruction on "mere presence"; and (8) there was insufficient evidence to convict Fry of felony murder and conspiracy to commit robbery. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Factual and Procedural Background
Sometim…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hicks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Thompson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Ross v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Cutter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Scisney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Belden v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Oldham v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Dickenson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- PSI Energy, Inc. v. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Jamar Minor v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.