PSI Energy, Inc. v. Roberts
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BOEHM, Justice.
PSI Energy, Inc. has petitioned for rehearing raising an important point of Indiana trial procedure that we have not explicitly addressed. We held that PSI had correctly argued that an employee of a contractor hired to deal with asbestos under most circumstances had no claim against a landowner on whose premises the work exposing the worker to asbestos took place. PSI Energy, Inc. v. Roberts, 829 N.E.2d 943, 948 (Ind.2005). We held, however, that the jury's verdiet was sustainable under the instruction on premises liability which was based largely on the Restatement (Second) of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burrell v. MeadsIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Mid-America Tablewares, Inc. v. Mogi Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. PressmanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- Lawrence J. Mathieu v. Gopher News CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Picadilly, Inc. v. ColvinIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Outback Steakhouse of Florida, Inc. v. MarkleyIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Illinois Bulk Carrier, Inc. v. Jackson Ex Rel. JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Selby v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- William R. Harr and Finster Courier, Inc. d/b/a Elite Express v. Julian Hayes and Tracey HayesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Swan Lake Holdings, LLC v. HilesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.