Corrigan v. Janney
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harrison
Plaintiff Carmen Corrigan, as personal representative, filed this action in the District Court to recover damages for wrongful death and survival. Defendants, W. P. Janney and Kay Janney, answered by denying the allegations of the complaint, alleging three defenses: (1) failure to state facts sufficient to constiute a claim for relief; (2) assumption of risk; and (3) contributory negligence. A motion for summary judgment was filed on behalf of the Janneys.
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was based on the theory that no valid claim for relief was stated in the complaint based upon…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Mease Ex Rel. Oliver v. FoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- Golden v. ConwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Brennan v. Cockrell Investments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Meech v. Hillhaven West, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1989
- Shump v. First Continental-Robinwood AssociatesOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Limberhand v. Big Ditch Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1985
- White v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1983
- Pfost v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.