Legal Opinion

Pearl v. Township of Benton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Berrien; Coolidge, J. Case by Arthur L. Pearl against' the township of Benton for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff recovered a judgment against the township for an injury received from the fall of a bridge, and the defendant has appealed.

The appellees brief states that the negligence of thé township consisted in its failure to sink the mudsills of the bridge sufficiently, and that in consequence the water *412washed the dirt from underneath them, and undermined the bents supporting the end of the bridge; also in neglecting to drive piles or posts to prevent the mudsills from slipping; also in neglecting to brace the structure. It was further claimed that the defendant was negligent in failing to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wakeham v. Township of St. ClairMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pearl v. Township of BentonMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Whitford v. Township of WashingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API