Legal Opinion

Wakeham v. Township of St. Clair

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1892PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to St. Clair. (Canfield, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.

This action is brought to recover for injuries occasioned by reason of an alleged defective highway.

From St. Olair to Port Huron the highway is laid along the west bank of the St. Clair river. Near where the injury occurred a creek empties into the river, and for a distance of from 30 to 40 rods on either, side of this creek the road-way had been built up with logs and earth. To protect this portion of the highway from the action of the water,' the township had constructed a breakwater, from 2 to 3 feet high, for some 60 or 80 rods along the river. The breakwater was formed by first laying a…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Neel v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Beattie v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Thomas v. City of FlintMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Finch v. Village of BangorMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  5. LeBeau v. Telephone & Telegraph Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API