Legal Opinion
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. Traffic Tech, Inc., James Antobenedetto, Spencer Buckley, Wade Dossey, Brian Peacock, and Dario Aguíñiga
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 23, 2025No. 0:19-cv-00902Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., No. 19-CV-00902 (KMM/DTS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Traffic Tech, Inc., James Antobenedetto, Spencer Buckley, Wade Dossey, Brian Peacock, and Dario Aguíñiga, Defendants. Before the Court is Defendant Brian Peacock’s Motion for Fees. ECF 288. For the reasons that follow this motion is GRANTED, subject to additional instructions for Mr. Peacock. I. Background This case involves contract and tort disputes between Plaintiff C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (“CHR”) against Defendant Traffic Tech, Inc. (“Traffic Tech”) and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Pvi, Inc., and William G. Skelly v. Ratiopharm Gmbh, a German CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.