Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Rose

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1997No. 97-30PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Jackson asserts that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his habeas corpus petition. As the court of appeals held, however, the failure to comply with R.C. 2945.05 may be remedied only in a direct appeal from a criminal conviction. State v. Pless (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 333, 658 N.E.2d 766, paragraph two of the syllabus. A claimed violation of R.C. 2945.05 is not the proper subject for habeas corpus relief. 74 Ohio St.3d at 339, 658 N.E.2d at 770.

Based on the foregoing, the court of appeals properly dismissed Jackson’s habeas corpus petition. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. PlessOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kirklin v. EnlowOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State ex rel. Larkins v. AureliusOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Collins v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Billings v. FriedlandOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State ex rel. Earl v. MitchellOhio Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API