Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Earl v. Mitchell
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 1, 1999No. 99-1262PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. A claimed violation of R.C. 2945.05 is not the proper subject for habeas corpus relief and may be remedied only in a direct appeal from a criminal conviction. Jackson v. Rose (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 51, 679 N.E.2d 684, 685; State v. Pless (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 333, 658 N.E.2d 766, paragraph two of the syllabus.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. PlessOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Jackson v. RoseOhio Supreme Court · 1997
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bradford v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Bradford v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Earl v. MitchellOhio Supreme Court · 1999