Legal Opinion
Daniel Aguilar v. Janella Gaston-Camara
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 28, 2017No. 15-3894PublishedCited by 133 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROVNER, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff, Daniel Aguilar, an inmate under the supervision of the Wisconsin Department of Corrections (“DOC”), filed a pro se complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that beginning in October 2012 he was confined for 90 days without a hearing based on a purported violation of extended supervision. He argued that as a person who was released from prison on parole status rather than extended supervision status, his confinement under the extended supervision provisions denied him the procedures that are afforded to parolees, in violation of the Due Process…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Kingsley v. HendricksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Burks v. RaemischCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- Bruce Giles v. Salvador GodinezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Monwell Douglas v. Faith ReevesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- John Sabo v. Megan EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025
- Ayesha Khan v. Midwestern UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Murphy v. RaoulDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.