Legal Opinion

Coker v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 1999No. 74276PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, Judge.

Movant Kevin Coker appeals from the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief in the Circuit Court of Cape Girardeau *8County. On appeal, Movant argues that the mption court erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion because his trial counsel was ineffective for promising him that all his sentences would be run concurrently. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

Background

Movant was charged by information in underlying Case No. CR595-1839FX with one count of burglary in the first degree, Section 569.170, RSMo…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Richardson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beal v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Cariaga v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Sneva v. R&G FOOD SERVICES, INC. dba LATITUDE CATERINGUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2019
  4. State ex rel. Delf v. MisseySupreme Court of Missouri · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API