Legal Opinion

Putnam v. Milne

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 25, 1973No. 72-99LPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment ruling that an *542election to determine if Klamath. County should establish a connty board of health was valid.

ORS 431.412 (1) provides:

“The governing body of any connty shall establish a connty board of health, when authorized so to do by a majority of voters of the connty at any general or special election * * *.”

The election was held on May 23, 1972, the date of the state-wide primary election (ORS 249.340). The question was presented on the ballot as ballot measure No. 8:

“PROPOSED BY REFERENDUM PETITION
“SHALL THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ESTABLISH A COUNTY BOARD…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thornton v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Vanek v. KirbyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Miles v. VeatchOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Henderson v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Umrein v. HeimbignerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Thomas v. PenfoldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  3. Sadler v. ConnollyMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Sadler v. ConnollyMontana Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API