Legal Opinion

Weibel v. Ferguson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 31, 1941No. Appeal, 83PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

The action was trespass for the death of plaintiff’s husband, fatally injured.by an automobile, while he was crossing a public highway thirty feet wide. A verdict for the plaintiff was set aside, presumably for inadequacy, and a new trial was granted. Defendant’s motion for judgment n. o. v. was overruled. This appeal is from that order: Fornelli v. Pennsylvania, R. R., 309 Pa. 365, 164 A. 54.

Plaintiff’s husband, a passenger in a northbound bus through the village of Glenshaw, alighted from the right-front door of the bus at Witmer Stop. The bus had stopped partly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Simrell Et Ux. v. EschenbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Mason v. C. Lewis Lavine, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Fornelli v. Penna. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Hutchinson v. Follmer Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Farley v. VentrescoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Enfield v. StoutSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Unangst v. WhitehouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Spearing v. StarcherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Brown v. SchriverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. McElhinny v. IliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API