Legal Opinion

In Re the Care & Treatment of Zishka

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 6, 2015No. 112116PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Leben, J.:

Paul Dale Zishka appeals the district court’s decision at his annual review hearing to maintain his status in treatment in the Sexual Predator Treatment Program. On appeal, Zishka argues that the district court violated his rights when it failed to hold a hearing and failed to appoint an attorney to represent him. We agree.

Persons involuntarily committed as sexually violent predators are entitled to an annual review hearing at which they are represented by counsel. Here, the district court gave no hearing notice and simply signed a proposed order'—submitted by the State—finding that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. In Re the Care & Treatment of HaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  4. State v. WadeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  5. In re the Care & Treatment of OntiberosSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Griffin v. BruffettCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2017
  2. Burch v. Kansas, State ofDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2024
  3. Griffin v. BruffettCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API