Legal Opinion
Teamsters Local Union No. 523 v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 22, 2009No. 08-9568, 08-9577PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Circuit Judge.
This appeal arises from an unfair labor practice dispute initiated by Kirk Rammage against the Teamsters Local Union No. 523 (“the Union”) and Mr. Rammage’s employer, Interstate Brands (“the Employer”). After a hearing, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”), acting through its only two members, determined that both the Employer and the Union committed unfair labor practices in violation of 29 U.S.C. § 158. The Union brought this appeal 1 and the NLRB cross-appealed for enforcement of its order. This case poses two questions: (1) whether the NLRB has statutory…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Radio Officers' Union of the Commercial Telegraphers Union v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- McGraw v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Mississippi Ex Rel. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- New Process Steel, L. P. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Laborers' International Union of North America, Local 578 v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- New Process Steel, L. P. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Hydro Resources, Inc. v. USEPACourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- New Process Steel, L. P. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 2010