Legal Opinion
Holland v. High Power Energy
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided April 13, 2000No. CIV. A. 2:97-1092PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
COPENHAVER, District Judge.
This matter is pending before the court on the motion of defendant, Pratt Mining Company, to stay proceedings in the above-styled civil action, filed April 12, 1999.
I
On December 5, 1984, Pratt Mining Company (“Pratt”) and Geupel Construction Company, Inc. (“Geupel”) formed a joint venture known as High Power Energy (“High Power”), for the purpose of performing and completing a contract with Bethlehem Mines Corporation for the mining of certain coal reserves in Nicholas County, West Virginia. Geupel held a 75% ownership interest in High Power, while…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- A.H. Robins Co. v. PiccininCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- In the Matter of S.I. Acquisition, Inc., Debtor. S.I. Acquisition, Inc. v. Eastway Delivery Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Lynch v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- John N. Fortier and Linda M. Fortier v. Dona Anna Plaza Partners, James A. Peterson, Peterson Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- C.H. Robinson Co. v. Paris & Sons, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2001
- Ampersand Publishing, LLC v. National Labor Relations BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Aron R Thompson and Nicole R ThompsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2023
- Edwards v. McElliotts Trucking, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2017
- Fidus Investment Corporation v. McCollumDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.