Legal Opinion
Ampersand Publishing, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 18, 2023No. Misc. No. 2021-0140Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMPERSAND PUBLISHING, LLC, Petitioner, v. Case No. 1:21-mc-0140 (GMH) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The merits of the underlying dispute in this case—whether Ampersand Publishing, LLC (“Ampersand”), an entity that used to publish a newspaper in Santa Barbara, California, should be held in civil contempt for failing to comply with a D.C. Circuit judgment enforcing an order of the National Labor Relations Board (the “NLRB” or the “Board”) sanctioning the company for viola- tions of the National…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lockyer v. Mirant Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- In Re Robert Gruntz, Debtor. Robert Gruntz v. Opinion County of Los Angeles Los Angeles District AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- In Re Baldwin-United Corporation Litigation. Vincent Erti, Joseph and Elizabeth Chupko, George and Margaret Ledney, William Neil Aicholtz and Janet Aicholtz and Genevieve Novicky on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc., Paine Webber Group, Inc., Paine Webber, Inc., Pwjc Insurance Sales, Inc., Planco Inc., Donald B. Marron and Donald E. Nickelson, Paine Webber Group, Inc., Paine Webber Incorporated and Pwjc Insurance Sales, Inc., Third-Party-Plaintiffs-Appellees v. Baldwin-United Corporation and D.H. Baldwin Company, Third-Party-Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.