Legal Opinion

Ford v. State

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 2008No. 20060720, 20070587PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Certification from the Utah Court of Appeals

DURHAM, Chief Justice:

INTRODUCTION

T1 This appeal poses two questions. First, whether, in 1998, court commissioners were authorized to conduct preliminary hearings binding defendants over for trial. Second, whether defendants who succeed in vacating their convictions in a post-conviction relief proceeding are entitled to paid counsel to represent them during the State's appeal. We hold that court commissioners were entitled to conduct preliminary hearings binding defendants over for trial in 1998. We also hold that impecunions defendants who are…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. State v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Salt Lake City v. OhmsUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Edward John Walker v. Ray McLain Sheriff of Lincoln County, OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kell v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. PooleUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  4. Mower v. MoyerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API