Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

BOSSE v. STATE

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 25, 2017No. D-2012-1128Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

LUMPKIN, P.J.,

Concur in Part Dissent in Part:

¶ 1 I concur in affirming Appellant’s convictions and sentences, however, I cannot acquiesce in the analysis of Proposition Two. As a State court of last resort, we must independently construe Federal Constitutional issues based on existing precedent from the United States Supreme Court and not speculate on what that Court may do or not do in the future.

¶2 Appellant neither invoked his Fifth Amendment right to silence nor fully invoked his Fourth Amendment right to refuse consent to search in the present case. Instead, he’ voluntarily spoke with…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API