Legal Opinion
Maier v. Patterson
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 1, 1982No. Civ. A. 77-3635PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GILES, District Judge.
Plaintiff has moved for a new trial asserting that the court erred in granting the defendants’ motions for directed verdict on Counts I, II and IV of the complaint made pursuant to Rule 50(a), Fed.R.Civ.P. For the reasons which follow, plaintiff’s motions are denied.
I. BACKGROUND
Raymond Maier, member in good standing of Local 107 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Ware-housemen and Helpers of America (“Union”), sued the Union and its business agent, William Patterson. Patterson was sued in his official and individual capacities because…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Don Chuy, in No. 77-1412 v. The Philadelphia Eagles Football Club (Sued as "The Philadelphia Eagles"), in No. 77-1411 and the National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., in No. 75-2405 v. Videfreeze Corporation, and David E. Chinnery Development Corp., Inno. 75-2406Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Edward C. Denneny and Catherine Denneny v. Bernard Siegel, Louis H. Block and the Albert Einstein Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Haas v. BartoDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Sherk v. LiebackDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1995