Hearst v. American Newspapers, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, District Judge.
The manifold and confusing aspects of this case, the variety of alternative prayers for relief, have made it difficult, at times, for the court to keep the real issue in focus. With diversity and amount in controversy present, I base jurisdiction on Perrine v. Pennroad Corporation, 19 Del.Ch. 368, 168 A. 196; Bouree et al. v. Trust Francais, 14 Del.Ch. 332, 127 A. 56; and Jellenik v. Huron Copper Min. Co., 177 U.S. 1, 20 S.Ct. 559, 44 L.Ed. 647, because the res is here. We must approach the issue and determine the rights of all parties as of March 16, 1942.
The basic…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jellenik v. Huron Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Alderman v. AldermanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- Perrine v. Pennroad Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1933
- Southern Pac. Co. v. ConwayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Bouree v. Trust Francais des Actions de la Franco-Wyoming Oil Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Illinois Central Railroad Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967
- Massa v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
- Klee v. Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railway Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- Garrison v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- In re MordecaiNew York Supreme Court · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.