Legal Opinion

Budget Insurance & Finance v. Leighty

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1980No. 14715PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy

Budget Insurance and Finance appeals from a judgment against it in the Eleventh Judicial District, Flathead County, entered after a nonjury trial, determining that Charles O. Leighty is not obligated under the terms of a retail installment contract and promissory note to Budget.

On April 2, 1973, Leighty (Leighty means Charles O. Leighty unless otherwise stated) entered into a retail installment contract with Western Motors, Inc. of Kalispell, Montana, to cover the repairs on a 1959 autocar diesel. Under the retail installment contract, he agreed to pay $1,496.64 over a period of 24 months to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. First SEC. Bank of Bozeman v. GoddardMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Farr v. SteinMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Cameron v. First National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Como v. RhinesMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Greening v. Mutual Life Insurance of New YorkDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1983
  3. Big Sky Civil & Envtl., Inc. v. DunlavyMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Chapman v. McVicherMontana Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API