Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barnwell v. ELLIOTT

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 11, 1954No. 16843Published

1DissentBaker, Chief Justice

I respectfully dissent from the prevailing opinion i'n this case.

If under the facts of this case as disclosed by the record, this Court is going to circumvent the law of this State that the res ipsa loquitur doctrine will not be applied, by holding that there is some circumstantial evidence from which the jury could infer negligence on the part of the defendants-respondents, then I think it best that we overrule the long line of decisions heretofore holding said doctrine inapplicable and frankly adopt it.

*69Whether the trial Judge had before him only the testimony offered by appellant and no…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Trimmier v. Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  2. Bunch v. American Cigar Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  3. Grainger v. Greenville, S. & A. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
  4. Weston v. HillyerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  5. Holmes v. Davis, Dir. Gen.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API