Legal Opinion
Van Schaick v. Lincoln Dye Works, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 15, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchenck, J.
The action is brought by the Superintendent of Insurance, as liquidator of the Equitable Casualty and Surety Company. Pursuant to an order of this court, dated December 30, 1930, the Superintendent of Insurance became vested with title to all of the property and contracts of said Equitable Casualty and Surety Company and was empowered to liquidate the business and affairs of that company in accordance with the provisions of the Insurance Law of this State. As such liquidator, the Superintendent of Insurance commenced this action against the defendant to recover certain premiums, amounting to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sawyer v. HoagSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- In re PeopleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Stoddard v. GuyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
3Cited by3 opinions
- Prince Carpentry, Inc. v. Cosmopolitan Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- Schenck v. Coordinated Coverage Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Super. of Ins. v. Intern. Equip. Leasing, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991