Legal Opinion
People v. Domanic B.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 17, 1994No. A060483PublishedCited by 4 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERSON, P. J.
Appellant Domanic B. contends the juvenile court acted improperly when it ordered that he receive a stayed commitment to the California Youth Authority (CYA), as in effect a condition of probation. There is a conflict in our district on this point. Certain dicta contained in a decision of Division Two, In re Ronnie P. (1992) 10 Cal.App.4th 1079, 1089-1090 [12 Cal.Rptr.2d 875], apparently cast doubt on the propriety of the imposition of a suspended or stayed CYA term. However, more recently Division One has criticized and parted company with the Ronnie P. dicta. (In re…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. Michael D.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- People v. Asean D.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. Ronnie P.California Court of Appeal · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- People v. Jose T.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- People v. Chad S.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. MeloneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002