Legal Opinion

Sutliff v. Smith

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 9, 1897No. 10226PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from Woodson District Court. Hon. L. Still-well, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

John H. Smith., -who owned certain lands in Woodson County, a part of which he held by virtue of a tax deed, traded the property to Jacob Trembly for a piece of land in Johnson County and a mortgage, for four thousand dollars, covering the difference in value between the tracts of land exchanged and also $350 of money loaned by Smith to Trembly. At the time the exchange was made it was agreed that Smith should perfect the title as against Asa G. Sutliff, who held the original title to the land. To insure the performance of this agreement on the part of Smith, the following clause was inserted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pier v. Fond du Lac CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Cartwright v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  3. Eaton v. GilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1869
  4. Styer v. SpragueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. Begole v. HersheyMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cressler v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Kingkade v. PlummerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Jackson Milling Co. v. ScottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Hounchin v. SalyardsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  5. De Carli v. O'BrienOregon Supreme Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API