Legal Opinion

Steiger v. Bonn

United States Circuit Court

Decided October 15, 1880PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Motion to set aside writ, &c.

1Opinion of the Court

Nixon, J.—

This is a motion to set aside the summons issued in the case, on the ground that the defendant was induced by deceptive and fraudulent means to come within *497the jurisdiction of the court for the purpose of serving the writ upon him. There seems to be a substantial agreement between the counsel of the respective parties as to the law of the case. They assent to the rule laid down by Mr. justice Clifford in the Union Sugar Refinery agt. Mathiesson (2 Cliff., 309), where he says: “ That where the defendant, residing in another district, is enticed and induced, to come into the district…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Margos v. MoroudasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  2. Cavanagh v. Manhattan Transit Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1905
  3. Kelly v. Citizens Farmers Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Oklahoma Industrial Finance Corp. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Taylor v. McCoolTennessee Supreme Court · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API