Legal Opinion

Moisant v. Dominick

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 16, 1992No. 92-C-879PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This application for supervisory writ is filed on behalf of relators John Dominick, D.L. Peterson Trust, Zurich Insurance Company, and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland. The sole issue is whether the trial judge was correct in determining that respondent’s, Daniel A. Moisant’s, cross claim against relators was not barred by prescription. We affirm the trial judge’s overruling the exception of prescription filed on behalf of the relators.

On May 19, 1992 Robert M. Duzac filed suit against Moisant, Vincent Hammel, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Continental Casualty Company,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Randall v. FeduciaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  2. WOOD ON BEHALF HAYES v. HayesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Patterson v. State, Dept. of Transportation & DevelopmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kevin v. City of OberlinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
  2. State v. CarterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API