Moisant v. Dominick
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Per curiam
This application for supervisory writ is filed on behalf of relators John Dominick, D.L. Peterson Trust, Zurich Insurance Company, and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland. The sole issue is whether the trial judge was correct in determining that respondent’s, Daniel A. Moisant’s, cross claim against relators was not barred by prescription. We affirm the trial judge’s overruling the exception of prescription filed on behalf of the relators.
On May 19, 1992 Robert M. Duzac filed suit against Moisant, Vincent Hammel, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Continental Casualty Company,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Randall v. FeduciaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- WOOD ON BEHALF HAYES v. HayesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
- Patterson v. State, Dept. of Transportation & DevelopmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kevin v. City of OberlinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
- State v. CarterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992