Legal Opinion
Kevin v. City of Oberlin
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided March 15, 2011No. 2010-C-0826PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GUIDRY, Justice.
|,In this matter, the intervening plaintiffs, Silton and Robin Fuselier, seek to relate the date of the filing of their petition back to the date of the timely filing of the original petition against the defendant, Meyer, Meyer, LaCroix & Hixson, Inc. We granted the defendants writ application to resolve a split in the circuits as to whether La.Code Civ. Proc. art. 1153, the so-called relation back doctrine, controls the Fuseli-ers intervening action or whether La.Code Civ. Proc. art. 1067, providing the time limitation exception for incidental demands, governs. For the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Grasser Contracting Co. v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Cat's Meow, Inc. v. City of New Orleans Through Department of FinanceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
- Giroir v. South Louisiana Medical Center, Division of HospitalsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. TheriotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- Nini v. Sanford Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rubin v. Non-Flood Prot. Asset Mgmt. Auth.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ForrestierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Olympia Minerals, LLC v. HS Resources, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- City Life Live v. Post Office Emps. Fed. Credit UnionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
- City Life Live v. Post Office Emps. Fed. Credit UnionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.