Legal Opinion

Grimes v. Grimes

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 3, 1985No. 8525DC770PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

We first note the absence of counsel for plaintiff in this appeal. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 52A-10.1 (1984) requires that the District Attorney represent plaintiff in the proceedings at the trial court level and apparently the Assistant District Attorney was present at the time of the hearing in this case. The statute also requires that the Attorney General represent plaintiff in this appeal. Appellant’s brief was served on the Assistant District Attorney, but not upon the Attorney General. Our interpretation of the statute is that the Attorney General is the attorney of record for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Thelen v. ThelenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Reynolds v. MotleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API