Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Motley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 21, 1989No. 8910DC178PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

At the outset, we consider ex mero motu whether plaintiff is the proper party to prosecute this URESA action in North Carolina. URESA is a procedural device, adopted in every state, which provides a mechanism for the expedited enforcement of duties of child support. See N.C. Gen. Stat. ch. 52A (1984 and Supp. 1988); 23 Am. Jur. 2d 966, et seq. Under URESA, an obligee (i.e., one “to whom a duty of support is owed”) who seeks to enforce child support obligations against an out-of-state obligor must file a verified complaint in the initiating state. N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 52A-3(6), -10;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tidwell v. BookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Settle by and Through Sullivan v. BeasleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Mahan v. ReadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Smith v. BurdenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Stevens v. StevensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Forsythe v. N.C. Dep't of Revenue, 2022 Ncbc 49aNorth Carolina Business Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API