Legal Opinion

County of Suffolk v. Amerada Hess Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 7, 2008No. Master File No. 1:00-1898; MDL No. 1358 (SAS); No. M21-88PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*550 OPINION AND ORDER

SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge:

I. INTRODUCTION

Methyl tertiary butyl ether (“MTBE”) is a gasoline additive that has contaminated groundwater throughout the United States. One of the problems with MTBE is that it can make water undrinkable due to its turpentine-like taste and odor.1 In this multidistrict litigation, three plaintiffs responsible for providing water to the public in the state of New York (Suffolk County Water Authority, the County of Suffolk, and United Water of New York) have sued various oil companies after their water became contaminated with MTBE.

At…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  4. Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (" Mtbe") Prod.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API