Legal Opinion

Maben v. Norvell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 8, 1958No. 36661PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The subject matter of this action is an attorney’s fee to he collected by Norvell’s estate on a contingent fee contract, or contract for fee to be allowed Norvell, in an action before the Mexican Claims Commission. Plaintiff contends that while that action was pending Maben acquired from Norvell a fifteen percent interest in the fee for cash advanced to Norvell, and for assistance rendered in the case. The claim and action referred to as the “Mexicali” case was successful and the amount of the fee therein awarded and to be paid to Norvell’s estate in subsequent payments of installments is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lewis v. SchaferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Hunt v. Tulsa Terrazzo & Mosaic Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Detwiler v. DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. Shade v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Krieger v. MarshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sinclair Oil & Gas Company v. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  2. Hart v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Roth v. Mercy Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  4. Harting v. Benham Engineering CompanyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971
  5. Herweg, Etc. v. Bd. of Educ. of Lawton Pub. S.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API