Legal Opinion

Central Production Credit Ass'n v. Pennewell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1989No. 55145PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWD, Judge.

Appellants challenge the trial court’s actions regarding their counterclaims and the trial court’s judgment in respondent’s action to recover a deficiency on a note after the foreclosure sale. We affirm.

Appellants, Eugene and Emma Penne-well, were farmers who had done business with respondent, Central Production Credit Association, for many years. Respondent lending institution is part of the Federal Farm Credit System. Appellants routinely obtained loans, in the form of lines of credit, from respondent. When a loan became due, appellants would refinance it with a new loan. On…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Herbert v. HarlSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  2. Dietrich v. Pulitzer Publishing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. B.L. Jet Sales, Inc. v. Alton Packaging Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Ederle v. EderleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Greening v. KlamenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Costa v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  2. Yoest v. Farm Credit Bank of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Turnpike Management Corp. v. Thomas-RichardsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API