Reardon v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART
Re: ECF No. 25
JON Si TIGAR, United States District Judge
Before the Court is Uber Technologies, Inc.’s (“Uber”) Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 25. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part..
I. BACKGROUND1
On December 31, 2014, Plaintiffs filed this class action, alleging that Uber’s practice of sending text messages to recruit .drivers violates the Telephone Consumer *1092Protection Act (“TCPA”). First Am. Compl., ECF No. 10, ¶1. Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that they received texts from Uber without having…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Webster Salasker Lucas v. Department of Corrections California Men's Colony-WestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Brickman v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Holt v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Marche Meeks v. Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc., Blazin Wings, Inc., Yelp, Inc., Nowait, Inc., and Wingmen V, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2018
- McMorrow Jr. v. Core Properties, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023
- Michael Aaland, V. Crst Home Solutions, Llc, Et Ano.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.