Legal Opinion
Richert v. Schindler Elevator Corp.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 28, 2012No. 11-CA-1099PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARENCE E. McMANUS, Judge.
lain this worker’s compensation matter the employer, Schindler Elevator Co. (hereinafter “Schindler”), appeals from a judgment finding it to be liable for supplemental earning benefits and medical expenses, and finding that it was arbitrary and capricious in its failure to pay same and therefore liable for penalties, attorney’s fees and costs. For the reasons that follow, we amend the judgment to award costs for this appeal, and as amended, affirm the judgment of the worker’s compensation court.
Claimant, Kyle Richert, was injured on January 29, 2009, while during…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Associated Motors, Inc. v. BurkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Banks v. Indus. Roofing & Sheet MetalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- Poissenot v. St. Bernard Parish Sheriff's OfficeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ezzell v. MiranneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Salazar v. Command Construction, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Sicard v. Touro InfirmaryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Morris v. Louisiana Machinery Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012