Julian Et Vir. v. Philadelphia
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Kenworthey, J.,
This action in trespass is by a husband and wife to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the wife in a fall on an icy sidewalk. The verdicts were for plaintiffs against the city and in favor of the city against the tenant of the property. The city has appealed from the refusal of its motion for judgment n. o. v.
Since the city concedes the question of contributory negligence was for the jury, we state only the facts essential for the determination of the question of negligence. The verdicts compel us to state them in the light most favorable to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holbert v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Decker v. Scranton CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Manross v. City of Oil CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Dean v. City of New CastleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Gross v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Zieg Et Vir v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Ward v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Casey v. SingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Solinsky v. Wilkes-BarreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Strauch v. ScrantonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.