Legal Opinion

Kent v. County of Hudson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 3, 1969PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

The Appellate Division reversed a judgment entered for the defendant on a jury verdict, 102 N. J. Super. 208 (1968). We granted defendant’s petition for certification, 53 N. J. 23 (1968). We affirm substantially for the reasons given by the Appellate Division. The issue not having been raised, we express no view as to whether evidence of negligence exists in the present record.

For affirmance^—Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Soiiettino and Haneman—7.

For reversal—Hone.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kent v. County of HudsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  2. Higgins v. American Society of Clinical PathologistsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. O'CONNELL v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  2. Willis v. Dept. of Cons. & Ec. Dev.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  3. Winters v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  4. Muntz v. Newark City HospitalNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  5. Schneiderman v. StreleckiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API