Legal Opinion

Gilliland v. Feibleman's, Inc.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 29, 1926No. 27348PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrunot, J.

This is a suit for damages for an alleged slander of plaintiff. The demand is for $30,000, the items being $15,-000 for injury to petitioner’s feelings and for mental anguish caused her, and $15,000 for the loss she has suffered because of her inability to secure employment as a result of the alleged slander. The defendants, Feibleman’s, Incorporated, and Harry Phillips, filed a joint answer to the suit, in which the employment and discharge of the plaintiff were admitted, the alleged slander denied, and all other allegations of the petition, for lack of information, were neither admitted nor…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Covington v. RobersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  2. Sibley v. LaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1892
  3. King v. BallardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1855
  4. Mohrman v. OhseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1865

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rougeau v. Firestone Tire and Rubber CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Clements v. RyanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Parsons v. Gulf & South American Steamship Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Daigle v. ComputracDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1993
  5. Lancaster v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API