Legal Opinion
Thompson v. FRIENDLY HILLS REGIONAL MEDICAL
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 20, 1999No. G019116PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
84 Cal.Rptr.2d 51 (1999)
71 Cal.App.4th 544
Jessie THOMPSON, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
FRIENDLY HILLS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant and Appellant.
No. G019116.
Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three.
April 20, 1999.
Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo, James H. Palmer, Barbara S. Van Ligten, Cerritos, and B. Kimberly Adams, for Defendant and Appellant.
Daniel D. Dydzak, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Certified for Partial Publication.[*]
O P I N I O N
CROSBY, Acting P.J.
Health care providers ought to know this rule: Above all else, do no harm.[1] So should their attorneys when…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Krouse v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Weathers v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Sanchez-Corea v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Malkasian v. IrwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Oakland Raiders v. National Football LeagueCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Jones v. Lodge at Torrey Pines PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Oakland Raiders v. National Football LeagueCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007