Legal Opinion
Professional Houndsmen of Missouri, Inc. v. County of Boone
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 16, 1992No. WD 44897PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPINDEN, Judge.
Professional Houndsmen of Missouri, Inc., challenges the validity of an animal control ordinance and the authority of Boone County to adopt it. The trial court found in favor of Boone County in Professional Houndsmen’s suit for declaratory judgment and injunction. We affirm.
Professional Houndsmen, a not-for-profit corporation with about 1100 members statewide, is a lobby organization for fox hunters. Boone County’s commission adopted the ordinance at issue on August 2, 1990, while Boone County was a second class county. On January 24, 1991, the county commission, after Boone…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hassett v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Craig v. City of MacOnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Rouveyrol v. DonnellySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- General Installation Company v. University CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Borron v. FarrenkopfMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Lamare v. North Country Animal LeagueSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Rees Oil Co. & Rees Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Rose v. Board of Zoning Adjustment Platte CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- City of Olivette, Missouri v. St. Louis County, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.