Usry v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
1. Eor no reason assigned did the court err in charging the jury as follows: “ Should you believe from the evidence in this case, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant was in the possession and control of the land on which the still is alleged to have been found, upon the place known as the Jackson place,— I say if you believe-the defendant was in possession and control of that land where the still is alleged to have been found, if you believe a still was found there; if you believe other paraphernalia was found there in connection with the still, such as oil, a stove, and such other…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Hanson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Rivers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928