Hanson v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
“In this case the motion for a new (rial contained only the usual general grounds. There was some slight evidence authorizing the verdict; and, the verdict having been approved by the trial judge, under the repeated and uniform rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court, a reviewing court is powerless to interfere. When the verdict is apparently decidedly against the weight of the evidence, the trial judge has a wide discretion as to granting or refusing a new trial; but when there is any evidence, however slight, to support a verdict which has been approved by the trial judge, this court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Toole v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
- Usry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Tate v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sudan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925