Legal Opinion

OSTROFF v. Yaslyk

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 17, 1964No. Appeal, 268PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

The appellants, who are attorneys, instituted a suit for their attorneys’ fees against their client, Ilko Yaslyk, by filing a writ of foreign attachment against the funds in the hands of the administratrix of the estate of Dymytry Yaslyk on deposit in the Philadelphia Saving Fund Society. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania intervened and filed preliminary objections, which were sustained by the court below and the attorneys have taken this appeal.

The appellants represented their client in his claim as an heir of the estate of Dymytry Yaslyk, a brother, who had died intestate…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Purman EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Way EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Weicht v. Automobile Banking Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Commonwealth v. MooneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Riley v. HirstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1845

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Buchholz v. CamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Wheatcroft v. SMITHSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth, Department of General Services v. Collingdale Millwork Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Decatur Contracting v. Belin, Belin & NaddeoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  5. Ostroff v. YaslykSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API