Legal Opinion

Buchholz v. Cam

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 12, 1981No. 2284PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Judge:

This is an appeal by a garnishee, the City of Philadelphia, (hereinafter referred to as the “City”) from an order of the lower court dismissing its preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer. The appellee, Gunter Buchholtz, obtained a judgment against Theodore V. Cam, individually and d/b/a Theodore V. Cam & Associates (hereinafter jointly referred to as “Cam”), defendant, and thereafter filed a writ of execution naming the City as garnishee. The writ was directed against: “all funds and retainages in the possession or under the control of the City of Philadelphia…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bulkley v. EckertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1846
  2. Weicht v. Automobile Banking Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Commonwealth v. MooneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Wheatcroft v. SMITHSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Ostroff v. YaslykSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Klebach v. Mellon Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Aspen Data Graphics, Inc. v. Boulton (In Re Aspen Data Graphics, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Commonwealth, Department of General Services v. Collingdale Millwork Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Decatur Contracting v. Belin, Belin & NaddeoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  5. Koken v. Colonial Assurance Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API