Buchholz v. Cam
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MONTGOMERY, Judge:
This is an appeal by a garnishee, the City of Philadelphia, (hereinafter referred to as the “City”) from an order of the lower court dismissing its preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer. The appellee, Gunter Buchholtz, obtained a judgment against Theodore V. Cam, individually and d/b/a Theodore V. Cam & Associates (hereinafter jointly referred to as “Cam”), defendant, and thereafter filed a writ of execution naming the City as garnishee. The writ was directed against: “all funds and retainages in the possession or under the control of the City of Philadelphia…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bulkley v. EckertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1846
- Weicht v. Automobile Banking Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Commonwealth v. MooneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Wheatcroft v. SMITHSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Ostroff v. YaslykSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Klebach v. Mellon Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Aspen Data Graphics, Inc. v. Boulton (In Re Aspen Data Graphics, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth, Department of General Services v. Collingdale Millwork Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Decatur Contracting v. Belin, Belin & NaddeoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Koken v. Colonial Assurance Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.