Legal Opinion
State v. Helander
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 13, 1988No. 87-11581; CA A46497PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarden, P. J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for failing to perform the duties of a driver involved in an accident in which property is damaged. ORS 811.700(1)(a). We affirm.
Defendant was cited for violating ORS 811.700(1) (a) after allegedly being involved in a “hit and run” accident on January 9, 1986. The citation stated that the violation occurred at “C Ave[nue] at or near 5th St[reet]” in Lake Oswego. Defendant waived a jury and his trial began in municipal court on September 24.1 The state presented evidence that a collision occurred at B Avenue near Fifth Street.2 On defendant’s motion, a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- City of Lake Oswego v. MylanderOregon Supreme Court · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BannisterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. TosteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- State v. TosteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004