Legal Opinion

Game and Technology Co., Ltd. v. Activision Blizzard Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided June 21, 2019No. 2018-1981PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wallach, Circuit Judge.

Appellees Activision Blizzard Inc. and Riot Games, Inc. (collectively, "Activision")

*1373 sought inter partes review ("IPR") of claims 1-11 ("the Challenged Claims") of Appellant Game and Technology Co.'s ("GAT") U.S. Patent No. 8,253,743 ("the '743 patent"). The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's ("USPTO") Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB") issued a final written decision determining, inter alia, that the Challenged Claims were "obvious based on the combined teachings" of the prior art references. Activision Blizzard, Inc. v. Game & Tech. Co., No. IPR2016-01885, 2018 WL…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. ABS Global, Inc. v. Inguran, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2019
  2. Aqua Connect, Inc. v. TeamViewer US, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2023
  3. Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Pass & Seymour, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2021
  4. Sure Fit Home Products, LLC v. Maytex Mills Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
  5. TrackTime, LLC v. Amazon.com Services LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API