Legal Opinion

Carlisle v. Saginaw Valley & St. Louis Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1873PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Saginaw Circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Carlisle, the plaintiff in error, is sued as a stockholder for' assessments on stock, and defends on two grounds: first, that he never became a stockholder; and, second, that by an arrangement with another company, the defendant in error made stipulations depriving itself of the power' of putting its terminus in East Saginaw, where it was to have been placed by its articles, and so destroying the chief consideration for the subscriptions made in that city.

The agreement in question was made with the Jackson, Lansiug & Saginaw railroad, for the use of the track of the latter company from the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Newberry v. Detroit & Lake Superior Iron Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. International Fair & Exposition Ass'n v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Peninsula Leasing Co. v. CodyMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Wright v. IrwinMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Wright, Ins. v. HixSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API