Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bothwell v. Keefer

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1933No. 5979Published

1Dissent

MORGAN, J.,

Dissenting. — While it is true respondent caused three writs of attachment to be issued out of the district court for Twin Falls county, but one of them was levied on real estate. The sheriff, in his return on that writ, recites that he executed it “by delivering to and leaving with Harry C. Parsons, County Recorder of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, a copy of said writ of attachment, together with a notice in writing that all the right, title, interest and claim of Filer Livestock Company, Inc., a corporation, the within named defendant, of, in and to the following described…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hard v. Boise City Irrigation & Land Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1904
  2. In Re Appeal From the Department of ReclamationIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Cooper v. ShannonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  4. Twin Falls Canal Co. v. ShippenIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  5. In Re Applications of RiceIdaho Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API