Legal Opinion

Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Shippen

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1928No. 4985PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

This proceeding was initiated before the commissioner of reclamation upon application of respondents as stockholders of the Long Island Irrigation Company for permission to change the point of diversion and place of use of 2,000 inches of the waters of Snake Eiver previously decreed to the Long Island Irrigation Company. It appears from the application that respondents desire to have the 2,000 inches of water changed from the point of diversion maintained by the Long Island Irrigation Company to the point of diversion maintained by the Farmer’s Friend Irrigation Company, and the place of use…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hard v. Boise City Irrigation & Land Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Wadsworth Ditch Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  3. Lower Latham Ditch Co. v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  4. New Cache la Poudre Irrigating Co. v. Water Supply & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  5. Crockett v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Application of BoyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Jenkins v. State, Dept. of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re Appeal From the Department of ReclamationIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  4. First Security Bank v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Federal Land Bank v. Union Central Life InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API